You might recall this post on Broadway National Bank, Trustee v. Yates Energy Corporation. We now have Yates Energy Corporation et al v. Broadway National Bank, Trustee, the court of appeals’ ruling after remand. Recall the result from the Supreme Court: Execution of the 2013 Amended Correction Mineral Deed by the parties to the original 2005 Mineral Deed and the 2006 Correction Mineral Deed, without joinder of the current owners of the minerals, complied with Texas Property Code §5.029. The question remaining was whether the current owners were bona fide purchases for value without notice. Skipping all sorts of rulings on side issues, the result is that current owner Yates was not a BFP. Other appellants survived to fight another day.
Continue Reading Texas Correction Deed Statute Revisited … Again
The Constructive Notice Doctrine in Action
Today’s “pay attention” edition begins with a quiz. What is the most important thing to read carefully:
a. Speed limit sign in small-town (insert name of Southern state).
b. Itinerary for that dream vacation, the one with multiple layovers of varying durations in airports and time zones far from your own.
c. Title documents to
The Well Operator Should Have Listened To My Mother
My mother used to give us good advice. For example: Don’t lie … do your homework. Sabella v. Appalachian Development Corporation agrees with my mother.
Sabella bought minerals in 1997 under 66 acres in Warren County, Pennsylvania, on which the Haners had two producing wells (under a 144-acre lease from the Harveys). They weren’t paying
North Dakota Good Faith Purchasers: At What Point is Notice Relevant?
Co-author Katie R. English.
The Question
In order to be a good faith purchaser, a party must not have actual or constructive notice of another’s rights. Northern Oil and Gas v. Creighton asked, When should the determination of whether a party has notice be made, A: At the time the second lease is recorded,
When Is a Notice-Of-Assignment Clause Not Effective?
A provision in a contract, no matter how unequivocal, does not always trump the law. The oil and gas lease allowed assignments, but no change or division in ownership of the land or royalties would be binding on the lessee until the acquiring party had furnished lessee with the instruments constituting his chain of title