Here we continue our discussion of the Texas Supreme Court’s opinion in Piranha Partners et al. v. Joe B. Neuhoff et al. determining that an assignment of an overriding royalty in minerals unambiguously conveyed the override in production under an entire lease. The Court concluded that circumstances surrounding the transaction didn’t matter. Here was the
Texas Supreme Court Rejects “Rigid Rules” of Deed Construction
The question for the Texas Supreme Court in Piranha Partners et al. v. Joe B. Neuhoff et al. was whether an assignment of an overriding royalty in minerals conveyed the override only in production from the identified well (the B #1-28), in production from any well drilled on the identified land (NW/4, Section 28)
Family History Guides Interpretation of a Texas Will
Co-author Kelley Clark Morris
Generally, if your will leaves your beloved “all … right, title and interest in and to”, said beloved would receive the entirety of your interest, whether a surface estate, mineral estate, or both. But in ConocoPhillips, et al. v. Ramirez, et al., the Texas Supreme Court looked beyond the
Keeping Score in Midstream Dedications in Bankruptcy: Midstreams 2, Producers 1
Co-author Lydia Webb
Ever since the Sabine Oil and Gas Corp. bankruptcy (the top of the first, If it were baseball), where a New York court construed Texas property law to hold that a gathering agreement was not a covenant running with the land, we at Gray Reed, and you if you’re following, have speculated
Strip and Gore Doctrine: Infinity War
Co-author Ethan Wood
Yet another entry in the Strip and Gore universe (2012’s “Beware of Strips and Gores”, and 2019’s “Strip and Gore 2: The Sequel”) comes to us from Fort Worth Court of Appeals: Richard D. Crawford v. XTO Energy, Inc.
Those of you following along with each chapter
Oil Field Services: What is the Status of Mineral Lien Waivers?
Co-author Ethan Wood
Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays from all of us at Gray Reed! Assuming that most of you have been good this year (stay tuned for 2019’s Bad Guys in Energy to see who hasn’t), we hope Santa brought you everything on your Amazon Wish List. Our sympathies go out to those in the oilfield services industry in Texas—it looks like you got a lump of coal. In Mesa Southern CWS Acquisition v. Deep Energy Exploration Partners the Houston Court of Appeals upended the long-held view that mineral lien waivers violate public policy. Bah Humbug!
Continue Reading
Mineral Royalties are Not “Personal Effects” in Texas
Co-author Rusty Tucker
Confirming the obvious, in In re Etheridge a Texas court concluded that “personal effects,” in a last will and testament did not include mineral royalties. Let’s investigate how the case got this far.
Continue Reading
No Sovereign Immunity for the Texas Land Commissioner
Co-author Kelley Clark Morris
Suing a state and its public officials is difficult because of the doctrine of sovereign immunity. There are exceptions. State of Texas v. Signal Drilling, et al. presents several of them.
The rules
The State and its agencies are immune from:
- Suits seeking to construe or enforce contracts to which the State is a party,
- Declaratory judgment actions,
- Ordinary trespass to try title suits.
There are exceptions. For example:
- Claims against a state official in his representative capacity for non-discretionary acts unauthorized by law (the ultra vires exception).
- Claims for an unconstitutional taking of property without adequate compensation.
- Suits to require state officials to comply with statutory or constitutional provisions.
The Duhig Rule Explained and Distinguished
Co-author Rusty Tucker
Let’s talk the Duhig Rule and estoppel by deed in Texas. Don’t run away yet. We’ll get to the point quickly and then you can leave.
Under the doctrine of estoppel by deed:
- “All parties to a deed are bound by the recitals therein, which operate as an estoppel, … and binding
What is “Oil or Gas” as Used in a Pipeline Easement?
Co-author Rusty Tucker
In Texan Land & Cattle II, Ltd. v. ExxonMobil Pipeline Company a Texas court of appeals ruled that “oil or gas” is not limited to “crude petroleum,” but includes refined petroleum products gasoline and diesel.
The easement
Texas Land’s property in Harris County is burdened by an easement obtained by ExxonMobil from Humble Oil Company in 1919 that granted the right to lay, maintain, operate, and remove a pipeline for the “transportation of oil or gas” across Texas Land’s property. The easement does not define oil or gas.
The arguments
The sole issue was the definition of oil and gas as used in the easement. Texas Land contended that “oil and gas” granted the right to transport only “crude oil” or “crude petroleum,” but not refined products. ExxonMobil argued that “oil and gas,” as used in the early 20th century, included refined products such as gasoline and diesel.
Continue Reading