Fletcher v. Merritt resulted in several rulings on the proof required to prevail in a property dispute. Merritt filed a trespass to try title suit (actually a quiet title, which the court construed as TTT) against Fletcher for ownership of a 28.9 foot-wide strip separating their lots. In concluding that the evidence was legally and
adverse possession
Defense of a Deed Signed by a 12-Year-Old Fails
Foreshadowing a grim future for family weddings and funerals, Bell and Petsch v. Petch is a property dispute over five tracts of land in Gillespie County, Texas, in which siblings are the combatants. The events are less important than the takeaway: To win an adverse possession claim, the claimant must establish all six of the…
How to Lose Your Working Interest in 26 Annual Steps
Co-author Cahill Maffei*
Can a non-operating working interest in a Texas oil and gas lease be adversely possessed? The Amarillo Court of Appeals said yes in PBEX II, LLC v. Dorchester Minerals, L.P.
In 1989, Torch Oil & Gas succeeded to a working…
Mother Hubbard Clause Saves a Property Deed
Co-author Rusty Tucker
Bell v. Midway Petroleum Grp., L.P., was a trespass to try title action, suit to quiet title for possession of a land, and a counterclaim for title by adverse possession. There are several …
… Takeaways
- A Mother Hubbard Clause can save a deed in which the property description fails to satisfy the Statute of Frauds.
- Testimony to establish adverse possession must be of such character as to indicate unmistakably an assertion of a claim of exclusive ownership in the occupant.
- Where there is a claim for adverse possession, an overly agressive party risks paying the oppoent’s attorney’s fees.
- Before you head off to the courthouse for vindication, remember that the complexity of legal and factual issues is wholly unrelated to the amount in controversy. We say that because this dispute seems like a lot of work for less than an acre of land.
Continue Reading Mother Hubbard Clause Saves a Property Deed
Limitations Title Not Precluded by Late Acknowledgment
Co-author Rusty Tucker
Scribner v. Wineinger, et al. affirms that acquisition of a Texas oil and gas leasehold by limitations is not defeated if the adverse possessor’s acknowledgement of a claimant’s title comes too late.
Transaction history
Scribner’s father conveyed all of the interest to his son by the “2002 Assignment” but Scribner was unaware of the instrument until 2016. (Thanks, Dad!) In 2010, the executor of the estate of the now-deceased father assigned the interest to Latigo. Scribner, ignorant of the windfall, didn’t claim ownership. By a series of assignments between 2010 and October 2016, Parra et al (including Wineinger) obtained the interest. During that time Parra and its predecessors operated the lease, received the revenue, and paid the taxes.
Continue Reading Limitations Title Not Precluded by Late Acknowledgment